Zealot by Reza Aslan


This book has been around for a while and got a lot of attention because the author was a Muslim writing about Jesus. The furor took off when Lauren Green of Fox News hosted Aslan in what has been called the “most embarrassing interview Fox News has ever done” (and that’s saying something). Reza Aslan defended himself citing his four degrees as a scholar of religions having studied Christianity for twenty years.

I didn’t have a lot of interest in reading a book about Jesus then. It seemed ridiculous that the Christian right was so incensed with a religious studies professor writing a book about a subject in his career field. A few years went by and my son suggested that I read this because my view of Jesus the peacemaker was all wrong. He had just finished Aslan’s book.


Zealot is a fascinating read searching for the historical truth of a man called Jesus. It’s an in-depth examination of the political and social times in which he lived. Jesus lived in a time ripe with Messianic hope and the God Jesus knew was bloody. He had a Jewish mission, telling his disciples to avoid gentiles as much as possible. In its time, “Love thy neighbor” was restricted in meaning to include only Jews. The historical Jesus is not the one of the Gospels. He was a zealot but not a member of the Zealot Party which emerges later. And Aslan talks about the Gospels being a theological argument and not a biography of Jesus of Nazareth.

Jesus brings the promise of a new world order challenging Roman authority. Aslan believes he probably gave himself the title, Son of Man. This title tied him to the Book of Daniel and restoration of Israel, but he fell short of calling himself a messiah and its ensuing obvious danger.

The book often discusses Gospel accounts and how they differ from each other, as well as from historical sources. I won’t go through the vast amount of information presented but will say, it makes very interesting reading especially when you start to get a feel for what’s behind the intention of certain parts of the Gospels.


The resurrection is central to Christianity but a difficult topic for a historian to cover. The author admits that something must have happened to push Jesus’s followers to continue the movement. Indeed, the resurrection narrative was part of early Christian teaching predating the virgin birth or passion narratives. Evangelicals wrote those narratives later to flesh out the story.

Jesus as a zealot and crucified Jew left behind a movement headed by his brother James (the Just). James was a follower of the law in Jerusalem. But Aslan makes the case that a crucified Messiah was not possible for the Jews and the new message that emerges under Paul finds ground only with more open-minded Diaspora Jews who are Greek speaking and urban. It’s Paul who triumphs bringing in a Jesus who is the end of the Torah. He takes this message to gentiles and succeeds. It is through Paul that the Jesus of the Gospel becomes the Christ- a divine being, the literal son of God.


The is a well written, easy to read book on a fascinating subject for many of us. It is perfect for the curious and open-minded. It’s one of those books, I’d say will stay with you long after you’ve put it down because of its thought-provoking nature. If you haven’t read it yet, add it to your list!





Filed under Book Review

14 responses to “Zealot by Reza Aslan

  1. reanolanmartin

    As always, thanks for sharing your reading list with us, Ellis! Another must read! xo

  2. You might like to check out Bart Ehrman’s work on the historical Jesus as well. It sounds like Aslan’s book has some similarities and draws on the same background, but comes at the subject from a rather different angle– Ehrman focuses on the apocalyptic nature of Jesus’ teachings.

  3. Love the review…I think I’ll check this out. I read a novel (The City of God: Transgressions by R.S. Ingermanson) that touched on the back half (Paul taking the Christian movement to gentiles and Jews, alike; showing how the Christian Jews (Jews who believe Christ was the Messiah but still follow the Jewish ways) were formed around Paul’s message.
    Although a novel, it was (according to the author’s notes) based on years of study.

  4. I read a different book decades ago that made the same general argument. I wish I could remember the title. It was also scholarly and persuasive.

  5. Thanks for your thoughtful review. I think it is important to recognize that there is a long, rigorous scholarship about Jesus. While there is plenty of clap-trap on the subject, we are not short of reputable, thoughtful works by scholars with differing opinions and differing religious/non-religious stances. The arguments that Aslan makes are neither new or startling. They should be taken as interesting food for thought, as you so rightly point out, but not confused with fact. I call attention to the New York Times Review that appeared in 2013. newhttp://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/06/books/reza-aslans-zealot-the-life-and-times-of-jesus-of-nazareth.html

  6. A good review. I am tempted to get the book

  7. I’m halfway through _Zealot_ and am enjoying it. Thanks for the review!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s